Kerry Tells Vietnam That U.S. Ties Will Deepen if Human Rights Are Protected

john kerry1

“Progress on human rights and the rule of law will provide the foundation for a deeper and more sustainable strategy and strategic partnership between the United States and Vietnam,” Mr. Kerry said in a speech marking the 20th anniversary of the restoration of diplomatic ties between the wartime adversaries.

Nytimes | Aug 7, 2015

HANOI, Vietnam — Secretary of State John Kerry told a group of Vietnamese officials and business leaders on Friday that improvements in human rights here would lead to deeper ties.

“Progress on human rights and the rule of law will provide the foundation for a deeper and more sustainable strategy and strategic partnership between the United States and Vietnam,” Mr. Kerry said in a speech marking the 20th anniversary of the restoration of diplomatic ties between the wartime adversaries.

“Only you can decide the pace and the direction of this process of building this partnership, but I’m sure you’ve noticed that America’s closest partnerships in the world are with countries that share a commitment to certain values,” he added.

Mr. Kerry arrived here in the Vietnamese capital on Thursday night for talks on trade and security issues, his final stop on a five-nation trip to the Middle East and Asia.

Continue reading the main story
RELATED COVERAGE

Secretary of State John Kerry, center, looking for his place on Wednesday before a group photo at a meeting of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.Kerry Urges Beijing to Halt Actions in South China SeaAUG. 5, 2015
The bar Chill in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The city, still known locally as Saigon, is a bastion of capitalism.Ho Chi Minh City Journal: Capitalist Soul Rises as Ho Chi Minh City Sheds Its PastJULY 20, 2015
Obama Hosts a Top Official From Vietnam at Oval OfficeJULY 7, 2015
David Clark, a retired Marine, at the Fourth of July barbecue in Da Nang said Vietnamese people Memo From Vietnam: War Veterans Lead the Way in Reconciling Former EnemiesJULY 5, 2015
Pham Binh Minh, Vietnam’s foreign minister, met with U.S. officials in Washington on Thursday.U.S. Eases Embargo on Arms to VietnamOCT. 2, 2014
Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, center, reviewed a Vietnamese honor guard in Hanoi on Thursday.In China’s Shadow, U.S. Courts Old Foe VietnamAUG. 16, 2014
The United States and Vietnam are both concerned about China’s growing military power and its claims in the South China Sea. Last year, the Obama administration partially lifted its longtime arms embargo on Vietnam so that lethal assistance could be provided to the Vietnamese Coast Guard.

Economic ties have also grown. Vietnam is one of the nations involved in the negotiations to draft a landmark Pacific trade treaty that President Obama is promoting, and trade between the two countries has soared to more than $36 billion, from $451 million two decades ago.

Mr. Kerry served in Vietnam as a young officer before emerging as a vociferous critic of the war. In his address, Mr. Kerry recalled the role that he and Senator John McCain, the Arizona Republican who is chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, played in resolving questions over the possibility of missing Americans from the Vietnam conflict, a step that facilitated the normalization of relations between the two countries.

“We are not still in the process of reconciliation,” Mr. Kerry said in his speech. “The big news today is that the United States and Vietnam have reconciled.”

But Mr. Kerry also spoke of the challenges the two countries still face, especially over human rights. While the number of political prosecutions in Vietnam has declined somewhat, Vietnam is still an authoritarian, one-party state, and American officials say legal reforms are needed.

Mr. Kerry emphasized the importance of allowing independent labor unions, as the Pacific trade pact that is under negotiation requires.

“The United States recognizes that only the Vietnamese people can determine their political system,” he said. “But there are basic principles we will always defend: No one should be punished for speaking their mind so long as they are peaceful; and if trading goods flow freely between us, so should information and ideas.”

In a joint news conference later in the day with Vietnam’s deputy prime minister, Pham Binh Minh, Mr. Kerry said that the country had taken some positive steps on human rights, including ratifying an international convention against torture and releasing a dozen “prisoners of conscience” last year.

Advertisement

Continue reading the main story
Advertisement

Continue reading the main story

But Mr. Kerry said the United States would not take additional steps to ease the arms embargo on Vietnam unless the country’s human rights record improved.

“Is there still room for improvement going forward?” he said. “Yes, there is.”

Mr. Minh asserted that his government was taking steps to improve its legal system but added that the country’s human rights record should be viewed in its “cultural context.”

“We hope the United States will fully lift the embargo on lethal weapons,” Mr. Minh said through an interpreter.

Mr. Kerry did not focus in his speech on the nuclear agreement he negotiated with Iran. But with the congressional debate over the accord heating up at home, he did not miss the opportunity to try to reinforce Mr. Obama’s assertion that the deal represented the best chance for a diplomatic solution.

“Standing here today, I’m reminded of conversations I have had recently with people who talk almost casually about the prospect of war with one country or another,” Mr. Kerry said. “And I’m tempted to say, ‘You don’t have the first idea of what you’re talking about.’ ”

“For sure, there are times when one may have no choice but to go to war, but it is never something to rush to or accept without exploring every other available option,” he said.

Mr. Kerry was careful in the news conference not to accuse Chuck Schumer, expected to be the next Senate Democratic leader, and Eliot L. Engel, the ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, of insisting on military action.

Both lawmakers announced on Thursday that they had decided to oppose the nuclear accord because Iran would be allowed to have a sizable program to enrich uranium when core provisions of the accord expire after 15 years. Because of that, they say, Iran would retain the option to pursue the development of nuclear weapons.

But Mr. Kerry said he “profoundly disagreed” with their analysis. “Rejection is not a policy for the future. It does not offer an alternative.”